Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 00:18
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
UNAIDS Executive Director: ‘The HIV Response Is in Crisis’ - Bloomberg.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Is it possible to use AI to help with interview questions?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Watch BETA Technologies’ electric aircraft fly into NYC with passengers onboard [Video] - Electrek
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Which unexpected celebrity has done a bold or revealing photoshoot?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
CDC warns of deadly listeria outbreak tied to packaged meals - CIDRAP
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Which race of women are the hottest?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
You probably don’t need foods with added protein, nutritionists say - NewsNation
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.